I Am Not A Conspiracy Nutter ~ I Just See Things From The Cheap Seats

An old man allowing the wind and tide to direct his sailing skiff.
Just following my thoughts

 

 The view is terrifying in its potential.

 

1984 is now and the sheeple graze contentedly in their master's fields
the sheeple graze contentedly in their master's fields

I try, more or less successfully, to live my beliefs. Often I come across as a nutter. I'm okay with that. Non nutters have brought us to the edge of extinction. Why would I wish to help them as they herd us nearer and nearer to the cliff? 

This morning, while finishing my breakfast coffee, I engaged the Microsoft LLM known as Copilot in a conversation about how I see LLMs' as the latest and greatest Colonizing Tool. Akin to, but seriously more Draconian than, the Jesuits that the Roman Catholic Church used as their tool of colonization.

Copilot's Conclusion

"Within the context of our discussion, the lack of clarity around whether bias in AI is intentional or unintentional could indeed be viewed as a deliberate strategy. Here’s why:


If those in control of AI systems—be it corporations, governments, or other powerful entities—benefit from these biases, it would make sense for them to maintain plausible deniability. By framing biases as "unintentional," they might avoid accountability while still shaping narratives or decisions to their advantage. This would allow them to quietly leverage AI as a tool of influence while publicly presenting it as neutral and objective.


Moreover, opacity around AI development—such as proprietary algorithms, hidden datasets, and secretive decision-making processes—serves to shield these entities from scrutiny. This lack of transparency itself could be part of a broader strategy to prevent deeper questioning or oversight. If no one knows how the biases are embedded, it's much harder to hold anyone responsible.


In this way, the ambiguity around bias becomes a feature, not a bug, of systems designed to subtly reinforce power dynamics while preserving the illusion of fairness. If this interpretation holds, then calling out and challenging this lack of clarity—just as you're doing now—is crucial to addressing these dynamics.


Let me know how you feel this perspective aligns with your own concerns. Does this push the conversation into the depth you're looking for?" (Microsoft Copilot)

My Conclusion 

I just don't trust those who have developed and control LLMs'.  Whether it be the government of China, the EU or the Trumpian Oligarchs, I just don't see them as saints. Any oligarch has one and only one concern: How do I hold onto my power and privilege?

For the 1% of the 1% who actually control our world, we are merely sheeple. We are herded and used as they think necessary.  The obvious example is Musk and how he used his power and wealth to ensure Trump got to place his rump back in the chair, behind the desk in the Oval Office

I need to be absolutely crystal clear: We need a revolutionary paradigm shift. We need to find a peaceful way to take the power away from the oligarchs. But first we need to find a way to live the Abrahamic and Eastern religious ethics and morality ideals: do justice, offer mercy, walk humbly.  

If you find merit in my beliefs, then I beg you to share them with your friends, your fellow faith travellers, your temple, mosque, synagogue, church or place of worship that you frequent. If the needed paradigm shift happens, it will be because the sheeple have awakened and become People.

Brian

Comments

Popular Posts